Senior lawyers among them Chief Mike Ahamba, SAN, Prof. Awa Kalu, SAN, Olisa Agbakoba,
SAN, John Baiyeshea, SAN, Prof Sam Erugo, SAN, Prof. Edoba Omoregie, SAN, Prof. Chidi Odinkalu, have expressed divergent views on the fate of Plateau State lawmakers sacked by the Court of Appeal-a judgment set aside last week by the Supreme Court as it relates to the state governor, Caleb Mutfwang. Recall that the Supreme Court had reinstated Mutfwang who had earlier been sacked by the Court of Appeal along with 16 lawmakers in the state.
While some lawyers argue that the fate of the lawmakers is forever sealed, others insist that the sacked lawmakers can still approach the Appeal Court in light of the recent apex court judgment. They were however unanimous in suggesting sanctions for judges involved in the Appeal Court decision.
Sacked lawmakers may still get justice—Ahamba, SAN
Speaking on the issue, Mike Ahamba, SAN, said: “It is not the business of the Tribunal or Court of Appeal to pry into nomination of candidates by parties. The Supreme Court was very right because the opponent must have belonged to another political party. And I don’t think such a person will have a locus standi to challenge what the party had done. If at all it is to be challenged, it could only be done by a member of the same party before the election. I totally agree with them.
“The Supreme Court, in the case of Plateau, has corrected the injustice done to the state governor by the Court of Appeal. But that judgment cannot benefit the Plateau lawmakers. That is unfortunate. The Court of Appeal is the final court of law on state and national assembly elections. The case of the affected lawmakers is therefore complex. However, I think what they can do now is to go back to the Court of Appeal and asked the court to set aside its decision in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court under an exceptional ground and let’s see if they will succeed.”
Indicted judges should be sanctioned—Agbakoba SAN
Former President, Nigerian Bar Association, NBA, Dr. Olisa Agbakoba said: “What happened in the case of Plateau lawmakers is final and nothing can be done. What has actually played out is that the electoral process failed us. The original idea given to us by INEC was that they were going to conduct a free, fair and transparent election.
It is because of their failure that the courts have now become a voting stations. The court became where to go and vote which is not its function. In my view, courts in Nigeria should not have any involvement in deciding electoral cases. People who go to vote are those who decide the outcome of any election but we have seen in several cases like the Kano case which the Court of Appeal mangled; the decisions of the courts was not what the people voted for.
“For the apex court to criticize the lower court is a very serious indictment. My first recommendation is that those judges that presided over those cases should resign or the National Judicial Council, NJC, should be proactive and invite them to explain why they made a thorough mess of a case and decided that two parties in the same matter won the case. That is the height of descent in our judicial history. I have never heard of a case where the judge decided that both the plaintiff and the defendant won the case.
“We should focus on the lessons learnt from this and how we can correct the mistakes and errors. The first point of call is the INEC. INEC needs to be completely overhauled so that they can have a narrow function. Printing of ballot papers and other things that doesn’t concern them should be removed from them. The petition process should also be changed. It should not be for instance, Peter Obi Vs Tinubu. The law should change to call the electoral umpire to account.”
S’Court’’ll be asphyxiated by NASS Appeals if—Kalu, SAN
Former Attorney-General of Abia State, Prof Awa Kalu, SAN, said: “This is a very tricky situation both for Plateau State and the nation as a whole in the sense that the Plateau situation has occasioned grave miscarriage of justice to the Plateau lawmakers. It is now in the open that the Plateau State House of Assembly members were in the same boat as the Governor. While the lawmakers sink in the ship, the Governor is afloat. The Governor, as a politician, must know what to do, i.e., how to work with those members of his party who were separated by judicial error.”
On the suggestions that the Constitution should be reviewed to allow appeals in National Assembly election to get to the Supreme Court, he said: “If the House of Representatives is fully complemented, there will be 360 members in existence. In addition, there will be 109 Senators, making the membership of both houses 469. If in one election season, half of the members of the National Assembly are fighting in Tribunals or Court that would leave the Supreme Court with 234 appeals to adjudicate.
For that reason, the Court will be further asphyxiated, and I do not agree that the Supreme Court should at any time have that number of appeals to be dealt with within sixty days as the law stands.”
NASS appeal should terminate at S’Court— Erugo, SAN
Law Professor, Sam Erugo, SAN, said: “I believe that the issue of membership vis a vis non-compliance by political parties with the provisions of the Constitution remains largely unresolved. Once there is non-compliance with the Constitution, it takes the dispute beyond the internal affairs of a political party. The apex court’s rebuke is remarkable because of the current penchant of the lower courts to refuse to apply the doctrine of judicial precedent in political cases.
“This is the reason for the controversial decisions of the lower courts. In view of recent experience, it has become very important that appeals in election petitions, particularly for elections into the National Assembly, should go up to the Supreme Court for proper judicial review. A lot of injustices were done in so many cases that ended at the Court of Appeal, and there is no remedy. It is obvious that the Supreme Court has been doing well in her review of appeals from the lower courts.”
Willful miscarriage of justice should be punished—Prof Odinkalu
An erstwhile Chairman of the National Human Rights Commission, NHRC, Professor Chidi Odinkalu, SAN, is of the view that the error in the decision of the Appeal Court in the Plateau cases were willfully committed and should be punished.
According to him, “You don’t have judicial review of the decision of a final court which the Court of Appeal is in parliamentary election disputes. However, it is possible for the court to review its own decision in exceptional cases.
-Advertisement-
Grab our latest Magazine, "Chief Wole Olanipekun, CFR, SAN, A man of wide horizons and deep intentions". Get your order fast and stress free.
For more details about Newswire Law&Events Magazine, kindly reach out to us on 08039218044, 09070309355. Email: newswiremagazine@yahoo.co.uk. You will be glad you did
Download E-MagazineDo you want to be heard, your events covered, your articles published, or need to advertise your products and services on our Blog and Magazine, reach out to us at Newswire Law and Events, you will be glad you did. For more details about our services, please call: 08039218044, 09070309355. Email: newswiremagazine@yahoo.co.uk
